User Tools

Site Tools


project_management

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

project_management [2018/04/08 20:10] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== project_management ======
 +
 +<​html><​big><​big></​html>​
 +Over and over again, states and countries have targeted decarbonization,​ believing they had the time and opportunity to achieve it -- and in time.  In the United States and Canada that has blatantly failed. ​ Generally, the promise has been that by setting up the correct market conditions, the market would provide the solution. ​ [[ :Results failures in U.S. Canada | It has not happened (examples).]]
 +
 +In Europe, there have been regulations and penalties put in place that have [[:produced some results in Europe| produced some results (links)]]-- though far from enough. ​ In addition, by claiming that biofuels make sense, they have covered up the statistics of important emissions of CO2 that are every bit as damaging as those from coal.
 +
 +We need every regulatory area in the United States to take the decarbonization schedule that best available science defines and make it happen. ​ This means enforceable caps on emissions, driven by the best-available-science based schedule.
 +
 +So, to achieve this, there must be a management organization given the authority to achieve the decarbonization,​ and it must be given the flexibility to change that schedule as new scientific discoveries demand.
 +
 +The following chart shows our understanding of the current Oregon energy agencies and their relationships to each other, controlling bodies and public enterprise.  ​
 +
 +{{::​bubblesandarrowsofagencies2.gif?​nolink |Oregon energy agencies}}
 +
 +
  
project_management.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/04/08 20:10 (external edit)